Botanical Witch Sheet
How do Nano Banana 2.1 Advanced, Qwen Image 3.0, Alibaba Qwen Image 3.0 Pro and 42 other AI image models handle an illustration & anime prompt? We ran this exact prompt once on each model, with no cherry-picking. Compare all 45 images side by side and copy the prompt to try it yourself.
Clean cel-shaded anime character sheet of Liora, a young botanical witch with a moss-green bob, amber eyes, and a pale blue traveling coat. Show front, side, and back views plus four precise hand poses holding seed packets, consistent facial features, inked outlines, labeled color swatches, white background.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The clean turnaround and palette are strong, but it shows fewer than the requested four hand-pose studies.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
Highly coherent character design; it substitutes expression heads for some requested poses.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
The consistent turnaround and hand studies are excellent, though the color swatches are unlabeled.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
Excellent sheet layout with only minor label roughness.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
The color swatches are present but unlabeled, despite that explicit request.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
A strong complete sheet with only mildly simplified hands and stiff legs.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
A polished and very complete sheet with only slightly stiff gloved fingers.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
An exceptionally complete sheet with consistent design and readable labeling.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
A highly polished complete sheet with excellent hand-pose and label execution.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
A richly detailed near-complete sheet with minor AI-like text errors.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
The painterly sheet is attractive, but a hand study holds the wrong object.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
The character design is clean but the hand studies and labeled palette are absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
The good drawing is weakened by mislabeled swatches and garbled hand labels.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
A strong structured sheet with five rather than four hand examples.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
It is a clean simplified sheet but lacks the four dedicated hand poses and clear labels.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
It lacks the required hand studies and labeled color swatches.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Strongest turnaround coverage and rendering, though hands and labels remain weak.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
A solid complete sheet, though the hand studies are stiff and repetitive.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
A highly complete sheet with only slightly stiff anatomy and minor label errors.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Charming witch design, but cropped and misspelled labels make the sheet feel unfinished.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The sheet is clean but uses bust views and an incomplete hand-pose set.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
The requested hand-pose studies are missing and the upper sketches are unfinished.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
The layout is complete, but the hand anatomy and packet lettering are uneven.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Clear turnarounds are undermined by repetitive stiff hands and erroneous palette labels.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
It looks attractive but omits the hand studies and labeled swatches.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★0.5
It duplicates the front view while omitting the side view, swatches, and hand studies.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Highly rendered design is undermined by outfit inconsistency between turnaround views.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Cohesive concept sheet but incomplete lower body and inconsistent costume details reduce adherence.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Clear sheet layout, but the cropped figures and malformed hand studies limit reference value.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Polished visual design, but its heading and prop typography are garbled.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Good visual reference structure, but the labels and packet text are unusable.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Useful views and palette, but the unlabeled sheet has uneven hand and outfit details.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Appealing multi-view sheet, but hands and costume continuity are visibly inconsistent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Clean polished turnaround, but it lacks full-body coverage and readable swatch labels.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Good presentation, but the hand anatomy and consistency across variants are only moderate.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Strong character concept, though garbled annotations and minor anatomy flaws reduce sheet utility.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
It is a portrait collage rather than the requested full character sheet.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Atmospheric botanical concept, but rough supporting studies and illegible annotations hold it back.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Well-composed turnaround with readable design, but it lacks the requested labels and precise hand studies.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Polished character art but missing a true turnaround, four hand poses, and labeled swatches.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Appealing character sheet, but its hand studies and prop grip anatomy are inconsistent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Attractive reference sheet, but its labels are garbled and hand anatomy is uneven.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
The design is cohesive, but malformed text and small turnaround inconsistencies persist.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Attractive sheet with solid views, but hand poses and garment details drift between panels.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Cute full-body concept, but inconsistent labels and hand anatomy weaken precision.
