Kestrel Studio Mark
How do Nano Banana 2.1 Advanced, Qwen Image 3.0, Alibaba Qwen Image 3.0 Pro and 42 other AI image models handle a logo & graphic design prompt? We ran this exact prompt once on each model, with no cherry-picking. Compare all 45 images side by side and copy the prompt to try it yourself.
Square vector logo for an independent architecture studio: construct a single geometric kestrel from three charcoal triangles and one rust-orange semicircle. Place the exact uppercase text KESTREL STUDIO centered below in a refined sans-serif, generous negative space, flat two-color artwork, precise symmetry, no mockup or texture.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A crisp, restrained two-color mark with the requested centered KESTREL STUDIO lettering.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Crisp, highly legible studio mark; the bird uses more than the requested geometric parts.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Clean typography and geometry, but the mark reads more as an abstract A than a kestrel.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Clear logo and text, slightly generic mark.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
The mark misses the exact flat four-shape construction and the text is split across two lines.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Precise four-shape construction lacks a clear kestrel silhouette.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Symmetrical and polished, but the abstract icon barely reads as a kestrel.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Convincing geometric bird uses more than the required three triangles.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Clean bird profile is close but includes an extra eye and non-triangular head.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Strong minimalist bird silhouette uses extra charcoal components.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Minimal architectural mark is clean but appears to use four charcoal triangles.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Graceful flat mark has extra triangles and a non-triangular head.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Crisp symmetric emblem does not clearly communicate a kestrel.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Well-spaced abstract icon is not clearly a kestrel and misses the triangle count.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
Mockup treatment adds many elements and misspells KESTREL.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Crisp geometric arrangement does not read clearly as a kestrel.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The attractive illustrated bird and textured poster treatment miss the minimal logo specification.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Polished logo has correct text but too many non-triangular bird shapes.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Balanced bird mark uses extra components beyond the specified four shapes.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
Low-contrast mockup styling and extra outlined forms obscure the requested simple logo.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Elegant bird silhouette exceeds the required triangle count.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Card-style mockup and numerous extra details conflict with the brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Sleek mark is clean but contains too many angular elements.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Strong symmetry and near-count, but shading and weak kestrel identity remain.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Visually refined but overly faceted and not limited to two flat colors.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
It is not a kestrel and the requested name is garbled.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The textured architectural block is not a clear kestrel or the specified four-shape mark.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The exact title is excellent, but the bird has too many curved and geometric parts.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The polished card mockup and extra polygons depart from the precise flat construction.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A clean mark, but the double-headed bird and segmented semicircle violate the brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The vector finish is strong, but two mirrored birds and many facets miss the specified icon.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The clean architectural symbol lacks the requested kestrel and three charcoal triangles.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The crisp architectural mark is not a kestrel or the requested three-triangle construction.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The clean architectural mark is not a kestrel and uses only two charcoal triangle forms.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The shape count is close, but it reads as mountains rather than a kestrel.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The textured arch is not a bird and does not use the requested minimal shape set.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Clean illustrative mark uses organic forms and extra bird details.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
The composition is off-brief and its small title is visibly rough.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Its bird-like symmetry and palette are close, but visible grain and serif type break the brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Illustrative border and extra shapes miss the required minimal construction.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The recognizable bird is attractive, but detailed wings and mockup framing miss the brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Clean restrained mark closely follows the requested geometry, with a slightly loose semicircle.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Elegant symmetry and spacing are strong, but the detailed owl-like construction is off-brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The bird is coherent, but added colors and many pieces miss the strict construction.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The polished minimal symbol does not depict the requested kestrel.
