Library Hold App
How do Nano Banana 2.1 Advanced, Alibaba Qwen Image 3.0 Pro, Qwen Image Max Uncensored and 40 other AI image models handle an infographics & ui prompt? We ran this exact prompt once on each model, with no cherry-picking. Compare all 43 images side by side and copy the prompt to try it yourself.
Portrait 3:4 mobile library hold-management screen with a clean ivory background and dark navy text. Show three aligned book cards, each with a cover thumbnail, title, due date, and status chip. Render exact header MY HOLDS, tabs READY 2 and WAITLIST 1, plus a coral button labeled PICK UP TODAY. Crisp readable typography, consistent spacing, realistic app UI.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The requested interface text is readable and structured well; extra screen details add clutter.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Strong UI structure; a few book-cover details are imperfect.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
Strong polished UI layout, but garbled card text and a READY-count mismatch are prominent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The ready-tab content mixes statuses and undermines the hold-state logic.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Clean, highly legible library UI with a minor count-to-list inconsistency.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Exceptionally polished and complete app UI, with only a small count-state mismatch.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Crisp, realistic UI, but the selected tab includes an incongruent waitlist item.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
A polished, comprehensive hold screen with a minor tab-content inconsistency.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Well-finished interface, though the hold-state copy is slightly off-target.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Very complete and coherent library app interface with strong legibility.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The overall UI is plausible but the book titles and status copy are visibly garbled.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Garbled interface text and confused controls substantially miss the requested app.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
The generic layout is readable, but much of the required library copy is nonsensical.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The requested structure is present, but distorted row text keeps it from reading as production UI.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The attractive composition is held back by incorrect tabs and garbled row text.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
A strong phone UI, with a minor mismatch between the tab and listed states.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
An exceptionally convincing, complete app screen with only a small state mismatch.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Strong visual UI execution, though three ready rows conflict with the displayed count.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The requested labels and card structure are clear, but the presentation is somewhat generic.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
The polished mockup has visibly nonsensical book and status text.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Clear and well-organized hold UI, with only a small active-tab content inconsistency.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
The phone presentation is convincing, but repetitive titles and mismatched statuses weaken adherence.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The layout is polished enough, but malformed titles and dates substantially miss the brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Cluttered mockup has garbled card text and no clear status chips.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Polished UI localizes every requested English label into Chinese.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Polished three-card screen accurately renders every requested primary label.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Excellent clean hold list, but the requested tab counts are absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Clean, complete three-card hold screen with all requested labels rendered clearly.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
Crisp simple layout misses clear status chips and introduces tab spelling errors.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The core labels and three-card layout are strong, though card metadata is nonsensical.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
The requested UI is present in part, but labels are heavily malformed.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Clean coherent UI has exact key labels but only two cards.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Polished three-card app screen retains every requested headline label.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Numerous garbled labels and inconsistent buttons undermine an otherwise recognizable list.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Fairly sharp cards are overwhelmed by garbled typography and incorrect labels.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Blurred, malformed UI omits the requested labels and pickup button.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A crisp attractive UI accurately delivers all key requested labels and three cards.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Sharp poster-like design lacks faithful hold-card structure and readable card copy.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
The stylized three-card screen is sharp, but requested labels are not exact.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
Spacious sharp design has weak title fidelity and incomplete card metadata.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Strong polished visual treatment, but it replaces the requested three-card layout with one feature card.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Severe blur makes the requested labels and card details unverifiable.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
Sharp layout is compromised by badly incorrect tabs and button text.
