A Fan of Five Cards

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

Five clean blank cards and natural hand anatomy make a strong card fan.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

The hand is natural, but the fan visibly contains more than five cards.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

Exactly five cards and the requested hand pose are cleanly captured.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

It nails five blank cards but leaves most rear fingers hidden behind the fan.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

The polished blank-card photograph shows roughly seven cards instead of exactly five.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

Polished photographic lighting and blank cards, but finger separation is limited.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

Exactly five blank cards and all four supporting fingers are clearly resolved.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Suit symbols make the card faces non-blank despite the otherwise clean execution.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

A convincing five-card studio photograph with only partly distinct rear fingers.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Correct blank five-card fan, with the supporting fingers not fully distinct.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Strong realistic blank-card image, with rear fingers partly hidden by the fan.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

High-quality five-card image, but the four rear fingers are not all distinct.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Readable rank markings break the requested blank-card faces.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Text rendering—

Readable repeated ace markings and blue card artifacts break adherence.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Six readable cards and obscured rear fingers undermine an otherwise believable shot.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

It gets five blank cards but does not clearly show all four fingers behind the fan.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

Five blank cards are correct, but one of the four rear fingers is not visibly resolved.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Convincing blank-card photograph, but the rear fingers are not individually clear.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

The otherwise polished fan has roughly eight cards instead of five.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
• Text rendering—

The fan visibly contains more than the required five cards.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Five blank cards are correct, though the rear fingers remain partly obscured.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

It gets the blank five-card fan right, but does not clearly show all four fingers behind it.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

The five-card photo is polished, but readable faces and missing visible rear fingers violate the brief.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Text rendering—

Readable card indices directly violate the blank-face requirement.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

The otherwise clean image has eight readable playing cards rather than five blank ones.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

It misses the exact count and shows readable card ranks.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

The photographic blank-card treatment is strong, but it shows more than five cards.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

Clean blank cards and lighting, but the fan contains too many cards.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Visible ace ranks and suit symbols violate the blank-card instruction.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Clean five-card fan, though the four rear fingers are not distinctly visible.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Readable card ranks and suits break the blank-face requirement.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

The image is polished and blank-faced, but only four cards are present and the rear fingers are obscured.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

The blank-card photo is clean, but the hand holds only four cards and lacks the required rear fingers.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Eight visibly marked cards miss both the exact count and blank-face requirements.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Text rendering—

Strong studio setup, but readable ranks contradict the requested blank faces.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Six readable, marked cards break the prompt despite a convincing studio photograph.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Clean five-card fan closely follows the requested arrangement.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

More than ten marked cards violate the exact-count and blank-face requirements.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

An overcrowded fan of marked cards fails the five-card and blank-face constraints.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Text rendering—

A sharp photographic hand, but six marked cards and hidden rear fingers miss the requested arrangement.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

A credible five-card hold, but readable faces, hidden fingers, and a landscape crop miss key requirements.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★1.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
• Text rendering—

The output is severely out of focus and shows too many marked cards.

• Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
• Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
• Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
• Text rendering—

Correct five-card grip is undermined by readable faces and hidden fingers.