Orchard Press Seal
How do Nano Banana 2.1 Advanced, Qwen Image 3.0, Alibaba Qwen Image 3.0 Pro and 42 other AI image models handle a logo & graphic design prompt? We ran this exact prompt once on each model, with no cherry-picking. Compare all 45 images side by side and copy the prompt to try it yourself.
Square vintage vector seal for a small cider press: an apple tree with five visible roots inside an oval border, two tiny stars at left and right. Render the exact uppercase words ORCHARD PRESS on the top curve and SMALL BATCH CIDER on the bottom curve, forest green and cream, crisp linework.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The oval seal, five-root apple tree, stars, and curved wording are unusually clean and readable.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Excellent vintage seal and readable lettering; the root count is not clearly verifiable.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Crisp vintage linework and exact wording; the root count is not controlled to five.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Readable seal text with a clean vintage feel.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The tree has far more than the requested five visible roots.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A strong vintage square label with exact type, held back by the circular seal and excessive roots.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The distressed badge and exact type are appealing, but its scalloped round form misses the requested square oval seal.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
This is the closest brief match, with an elegant square frame and oval seal, though the root count is too high.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The polished oval badge has fully correct text, but it is not a square seal and carries too many roots.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A handsome engraved design with exact lettering, but it is an oval rather than a square seal and has too many roots.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The lettering is correct, but the simplified root shapes and circular badge do not convincingly meet the seal brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
High-detail engraving and exact text are strong, but the busy circular badge has far more than five roots.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Clean and readable, but the generic sparse tree lacks apple detail and the composition is not a square seal.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The five visible roots, oval border, and exact text fit well, but the icon is too simplified and not square.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Correct type cannot offset the blurry low-detail tree, missing apples, circular badge, and non-vintage treatment.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The text is exact and legible, but the mark is overly simple with a circular border and little apple detail.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Readable seal text is offset by a generic tree, many roots, and extra colors.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
All wording is crisp and correct, though the circular border and excessive roots miss key brief details.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A polished square label with exact wording, but it uses a circular border and far too many roots.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Strong vintage treatment, but the outer square frame and excess roots depart from the prompt.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The oval and lettering are clean, but the tall sparse composition and many roots stray from the requested square seal.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Correct lettering is undermined by a cropped circular seal and an overgrown root system.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The clean oval design has exact type, but floating text, missing apple detail, and excessive roots weaken adherence.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Fine engraved detail and exact type work well, but the design is an oval rather than the requested square seal.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
The misspelled top text and off-palette generic tree are major failures despite detailed engraving.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Multiple garbled words and soft, low-authenticity artwork make this a poor match for the brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A polished apple-tree seal, though it has many roots instead of exactly five.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Legible text and apples work well, but the square label and many roots miss the brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Clean vector work, but the tree has no apples and the roots are not five.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Readable lettering works, but the extra oversized apples and many roots weaken adherence.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Decorative linework is clean, but it is a generic tree with many roots and extra ornaments.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
An especially clean apple-tree mark, though the root count is well above five.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Crisp text and palette, but it lacks apples and uses far more than five roots.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A refined botanical seal with excellent text, but it shows far more than five roots.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Fine engraved linework and excellent text are held back by too many roots.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Crisp graphics and text cannot overcome the missing apples and wrong star count.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
Engraved seal styling is excellent, but the bottom text is misspelled and the requested oval border is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The distorted bottom text is the major flaw in an otherwise loose generic badge.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The apple tree and words are clear, but the square frame and excess roots miss the brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Clean lettering but it misses the apple tree and five-root requirement.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Clean ornamentation and text, but it lacks apples and has the wrong star and root counts.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
The misspelled top text and cropped black artifact undermine the seal.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A handsome apple tree mark, though the banner layout and root count miss the requested seal.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The typography is strong, but apples and a complete oval border are missing.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The awkward tree and four stars are visibly at odds with the requested seal.
