Six Jars, Two Rows
How do Nano Banana 2.1 Advanced, Alibaba Qwen Image 3.0 Pro, Qwen Image Max Uncensored and 40 other AI image models handle a counting & composition prompt? We ran this exact prompt once on each model, with no cherry-picking. Compare all 43 images side by side and copy the prompt to try it yourself.
Horizontal 3:2 photograph of six identical glass jars on a kitchen counter, arranged in two rows of three. The back row is filled with white rice; the front row is empty, with each front jar's lid resting on the counter in front of it. Straight-on view, labels blank, soft even light.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
The two-row jar arrangement, fillings, blank labels, and loose lids all match exactly.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
It precisely separates three rice-filled back jars from three empty front jars with lids correctly placed.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
The front jars contain rice and appear lidded despite lids placed in front.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It gets the six-jar arrangement and lids right, but the view and lighting are not fully straight-on and even.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It closely follows the requested six-jar layout, with only a mildly angled viewpoint.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
The jar arrangement is right, but the requested blank labels are absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
All six jars, rice placement, blank labels, and three loose front lids are correct.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
The requested setup is complete, with only a slightly elevated camera angle.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
It accurately delivers the requested six-jar arrangement with convincing product-photo realism.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
All requested elements are present, though the rear row sits on a raised counter ledge.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It shows only three filled jars in one row instead of the requested setup.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
It cleanly fulfills the six-jar, two-row arrangement, with only the label detail absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
It closely matches the requested six-jar scene, with only slight softness toward the edges.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It has eight jars with five empty front-row jars, a clear count failure.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
It shows five filled jars in one row, with only two loose lids.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It uses eight jars in stacked rows of four rather than six jars in two rows of three.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It has the correct six jars and fill pattern, but stacks the back row directly atop the front row.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
There is an extra fourth loose lid in front of the empty jars.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It nails the requested arrangement, though the high-key treatment washes out some detail.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
The photographic setup is strong, but it has four empty front jars instead of the required three.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
The front-row jars are visibly filled when they should be empty.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★0.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
A handsome clean photograph, but it contains four jars in one row rather than the required six-jar grid.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
Soft product lighting is good, but ten jars and attached lids miss the requested setup.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It shows ten lidded, rice-filled jars instead of the specified six with empty front jars.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
The correct fill pattern is undermined by eight jars stacked in two rows of four.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
The image is a convincing soft-lit photo but shows five rice-filled jars in one row instead of the required two rows of six.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It nails the six-jar two-row photograph, but every front jar is filled and labels are absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
The six-jar grid and loose lids are strong, but the front jars visibly contain rice.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
It doubles the required jar count, showing twelve jars rather than six.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
Two front-row jars are incorrectly filled with rice.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
Only four jars appear, with filled front jars and lids still attached.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
The empty front jars and loose lids are present, but there are ten jars with distorted stacking.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
The clean photo has eight jars in two rows of four, and most front jars contain rice.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It produces eight stacked jars, including filled front jars and no loose front lids.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering—
It produces seven jars with five rice-filled jars rather than the specified six and three.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It substitutes five filled jars in a single row for the specified two-row setup.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It visibly generates eight jars rather than six, including five empty front-row jars.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
Six jars are shown, but all are filled in a single row and the loose lids are missing.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
It renders five filled jars in one row rather than the requested two rows of three.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★0.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering—
It is a competent kitchen photo, but five lidded rice jars replace the required two-row arrangement.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★0.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
The polished photo shows only five filled jars in one row, with no loose lids.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★0.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
The realistic photo has only four rice-filled jars in one row and no loose lids.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering—
Six jars are present, but the rows and rice placement are badly wrong.
















































