Museum Wayfinding Poster
How do Nano Banana 2.1 Advanced, Qwen Image 2.1, Alibaba Qwen Image 3.0 Pro and 43 other AI image models handle a typography & posters prompt? We ran this exact prompt once on each model, with no cherry-picking. Compare all 46 images side by side and copy the prompt to try it yourself.
Square contemporary museum wayfinding poster on matte white stock. Render the exact title NORTH GALLERY in bold cobalt sans serif across the top; center a large orange arrow pointing right; place FLOOR 02 • SCULPTURE • EAST WING in three perfectly aligned small black lines beneath. Clean grid, generous margins, flawless spelling.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Excellent grid and arrow, but the required bullet separators are absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Crisp, highly legible wayfinding design, but the requested separator dots are absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Clear typography and arrow; supporting text is on one line rather than three.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The grid, arrow and all requested copy are exceptionally clean.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Clean gallery signage
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The footer is one oversized line instead of three small aligned lines.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Polished museum poster, but the footer lacks bullet separators.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Clean, realistic poster with the footer separators omitted.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Crisp graphic, though the oversized title and footer layout miss the brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
Misplaced trailing bullets make the requested footer text incorrect.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Clean typography, but the footer punctuation is split into separate dots.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Realistic stock and crisp print, but the footer punctuation is incorrectly separated.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Plausible paper stock and clean layout, but separator bullets are absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Strongest all-round museum-poster execution, with bullets omitted.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Cropping marks and an off-centre tiny footer undermine the clean grid.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
Extra gibberish and grid clutter break the clean poster brief.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Exact footer text is strong, but the title is split and layout deviates.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Correct words, but the dark retro block misses the requested white wayfinding style.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
Realistic print, but the footer is mispositioned and punctuated incorrectly.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Excellent clean poster with accurate wording but no bullet separators.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
Unrequested rules and a stray dot compromise the footer layout.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
All key words are correct, but the scale and poster realism are weak.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Well-rendered mounted poster, but its split title and footer placement miss the grid.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
All requested text is exact and clear, though the title is cramped against the top edge.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Clean, realistic wayfinding poster; only the footer separators are missing.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The misspelled FLOOR and split title are major typography failures.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★0.5
Severe spelling errors and repeated text fail the typography requirement.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The mounted sign is polished and legible, but its bottom layout adds a stray bullet and misses the requested three lines.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
The polished sign is undermined by the visible FLOR 02 typo and dangling bullet.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The main wording is clear and correct, but the requested bullets are absent from the three-line detail block.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
A clean, attractive poster, but the title is split and the requested bullet-separated detail treatment is incomplete.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A sharp, balanced poster with exact, highly legible text and a strong directional hierarchy.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Text is exact, but the lower copy is on one line and the arrow geometry is visibly crude.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The crisp design has flawless text, but the required three-line detail block is condensed into one line.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
All wording is exact and crisp, but the required three-line detail block is reduced to one line.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
The main poster is excellent, but the tiny unreadable footer copy is a visible text-rendering flaw.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The duplicate GALLERY line is a clear content error despite otherwise readable wayfinding text.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
The SCULIPTURE misspelling and FLOOR 01 error make this otherwise clean sign unusable as exact wayfinding.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
The misspelled GALERY headline is a conspicuous failure in an otherwise polished outdoor wayfinding sign.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The requested content is exact and clear, with only slightly cramped top spacing and a synthetic print feel.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
The GALERY typo is the major flaw in an otherwise clear, high-contrast poster.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
The misspelled GALERY title and duplicated EAST WING make the otherwise neat poster unreliable.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Malformed lower text, including Loor 02 and garbled footer copy, prevents functional wayfinding.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The large arrow points left rather than right, and the lower text uses awkward dangling bullets.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Garbled microtext and the merged NORTHGALLERY headline substantially weaken the attractive graphic concept.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The bold visual design is clean, but the destination title is visibly garbled as GIAL•ALERY.
