Metro Ticket Interface
How do Nano Banana 2.1 Advanced, Alibaba Qwen Image 3.0 Pro, Qwen Image Max Uncensored and 40 other AI image models handle an infographics & ui prompt? We ran this exact prompt once on each model, with no cherry-picking. Compare all 43 images side by side and copy the prompt to try it yourself.
Portrait 3:4 mobile transit ticket app interface for a morning commute, showing a route map, countdown departure card, fare selector, QR ticket, and accessible navigation. Render exact labels: Riverside Line, 08:42 Departure, Zone 2, and Scan to Board. Crisp realistic UI, restrained teal and cream palette.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
All requested labels are rendered cleanly in a highly believable transit UI.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Readable UI with solid hierarchy; small text is the weak point.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The full canvas misses the requested 3:4 portrait framing despite a polished, readable core interface.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
A complete and highly legible ticket interface with all requested elements.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The only clear omission is dedicated accessible navigation.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★0.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Exceptionally crisp complete UI with every requested label and feature.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Complete, polished interface with excellent hierarchy and exact text.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.5
Exceptionally complete and legible ticket UI, though it reads slightly tablet-like.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
All requested transit-ticket components are clear and accurately labeled.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
An excellent UI, with accessible navigation as the single clear omission.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The route map is simplified, but the core ticket interface is complete.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Clean required content, but it lacks the requested accessible navigation.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
Text artifacts and the missing fare selector weaken an otherwise recognizable UI.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
The QR ticket is missing and several small labels are garbled.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
Malformed fare and accessibility labels noticeably reduce usability and fidelity.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★5.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
All requested ticket UI elements and labels are rendered cleanly.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
A polished ticket UI, weakened by the incorrect selector label.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
Clean key labels and ticket modules are strong, but accessible navigation is not explicit.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
The accessible navigation label contains a clear typo.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The split two-phone composition omits clear fare and accessibility navigation.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
Accessible navigation is absent from an otherwise complete interface.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★5.0
The station label is visibly malformed in an otherwise complete UI.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
Numerous garbled labels and the missing scan instruction undermine the ticket UI.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
The fare selector and accessible navigation are not convincingly present.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
A polished transit layout gets nearly all key UI elements and labels right.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
The in-hand commute presentation is convincing, but multiple labels are visibly garbled.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
The complete mobile transit layout is clear, but the route label is imperfect.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
Readable cards and several labels work well, but Zone 2 and a true route map are missing.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
Several central labels are wrong and accessible navigation is absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
The chaotic distorted layout and unreadable labels miss much of the requested interface.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
Pervasively garbled text undermines the otherwise recognizable transit-ticket concept.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
A solid ticket-app grid includes all major modules, but minor labels remain garbled.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.5
Key ticket content is present, but the fare selector and map text are inconsistent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.0
The screen is cluttered and garbled rather than a crisp realistic transit UI.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
The palette and QR-like motif fit, but nearly all required labels are missing or unreadable.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★1.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.0
Severe blur and obstruction leave the labels and QR ticket ineffective.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★4.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★4.0
An attractive realistic station mockup has key labels and ticket elements, but no explicit accessible navigation.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
The teal cream concept is attractive, but two phones and garbled text break the requested interface.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
The graphic ticket design carries core concepts, but most app text and Zone 2 are wrong.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★2.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
Severe text artifacts and a split-screen layout miss the requested interface.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★3.0
A compact ticket UI has the core modules, but small text and the QR label are incorrect.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★2.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★1.5
The phone context and basic modules work, but required labels are largely misspelled or absent.
- Prompt adherence★★★★★★★★★★3.0
- Style fidelity★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Quality & detail★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Realism & anatomy★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Composition & framing★★★★★★★★★★3.5
- Look & lighting★★★★★★★★★★4.0
- Text rendering★★★★★★★★★★2.5
The realistic phone presentation is good, but the main route label and small text are misspelled.
